In this era of rising cybercrimesand never-ending cyber attacks, having proactive cybersecurity policies is a must for every organization. Many organizations have realized the importance of information security. They have even set up dedicated departments with professional cybersecurity experts to ensure a robust defense mechanism against cyber attacks. Still, many IT firms around the world struggle with eliminating possible exploitation of their applications. Ever wondered why? It is because of increasingly relying on automated tools instead of manual penetration testing.
To understand the importance of manual pentesting, one should first learn what makes it different from the usual vulnerability scanning. Though, both methods have one common goal – that is – spotting possible bugs in an app.
The results from automated vulnerability scanning in comparison to manual are often different. In other words, automated scanning tools merely focuses on identifying the risk spots in the apps. This is primarily done using various automated scanning tools that assist in identifying more bugs in a short time.
Whereas manual penetration testing involves human effort, skill, and knowledge to find potentially vulnerable areas. Moreover, it also includes exploiting those bugs and developing proof of concepts (PoC) that can help a client better understand the risk of the issue.
Here is a quick list of the main reasons why organizations should consider manual pentesting:
1. Efficient Detection Of Hidden Bugs
The main advantage of manual penetration testing is the ability to detect the weak spots in the software before a cybercriminal. While automated scanning will evaluate the app quickly, it may not effectively detect logical issues and can be prone to false positives.
With manual pentesting, the exploitation is done from a human viewpoint. Therefore, it lets the businesses figure out how an attacker would exploit the the company from a real-world perspective. Such testing also facilitates the firms to define clear ways of preventing those application bugs in the future as well.
2. Effective Validation Of App Security
Automated scanning for vulnerabilities will likely generate more false positives and negatives than manual review. Thus, an organization may not exactly determine the security status of an app.